{"id":193,"date":"2010-05-24T12:48:27","date_gmt":"2010-05-24T12:48:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/carrollmyth.wordpress.com\/?p=193"},"modified":"2010-05-24T12:48:27","modified_gmt":"2010-05-24T12:48:27","slug":"that-thing-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/2010\/05\/24\/that-thing-again\/","title":{"rendered":"That thing again&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Rejecting Apology II has generated a huge amount of response in the last day, some of which we can even publish without risking nausea in our readers.\u00a0 Check out the &#8216;recent comments&#8217; section in the sidebar.<\/p>\n<p>A repeated argument is\u00a0that if a man wants to have sex with kids but doesn&#8217;t act on it then he&#8217;s &#8216;innocent&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Well,\u00a0 if we&#8217;re talking court of law, then of course that&#8217;s true.\u00a0 He hasn&#8217;t committed a crime, so he&#8217;s innocent of that crime. But we aren&#8217;t discussing legality we&#8217;re discussing morality and responsibility. And a man who is sexually attracted to children has the obvious moral responsibility to ensure he doesn&#8217;t harm them as a result of his inclination.\u00a0 He can only do that by staying away from them. The awful blurry world inhabited by Porlaverded, CuteyPie and their ilk, in which there are &#8216;good&#8217; pedophiles (them) and &#8216;bad&#8217; pedophiles (not them), is both dangerous and terminally dishonest. However much these &#8216;child-love&#8217; types believe they aren&#8217;t harming any kids they consort with, however much they draw a line between their desires and behaviour and the &#8216;abusive&#8217;\u00a0 conduct\u00a0 of the &#8216;bad&#8217; pedos,\u00a0 they&#8217;re just deluding themselves.\u00a0 And\u00a0 &#8211; the part that most concerns us &#8211; using the mythic image of Carroll to aid in this delusion.<\/p>\n<p>So, let&#8221;s state again \u2013 <em>if, despite all evidence, <\/em>Lewis Carroll\u00a0truly was a pedophile, and if he befriended kids, won their affections, played with their minds, watched their nakedness, while letting them inevitably sense the inappropriateness of his approach, then even if he didn&#8217;t go any further,\u00a0 he abused those children. In fact being obliquely head-fucked by some person they love and trust\u00a0 is going to scar a kid more not less than the more overt\u00a0 stuff done by those\u00a0presumed &#8216;bad&#8217; guys, who are at least honest about their intent.<\/p>\n<p>Carroll scholars and enthusiasts need to show the deluded souls who (let&#8217;s not kid ourselves) haunt Carrollianism that this image they nurture of Carroll\u00a0 as &#8216;pedophilia incarnate and sanctified&#8217;\u00a0 is a lie. Not only is this justice for Carroll, it&#8217;s removing from them a powerful agent of their own self-justification.<\/p>\n<p>Last time\u00a0we said this we were mailed by the LCSNA to ask\u00a0 for assistance in setting up a good Myth-FAQ.\u00a0\u00a0Not sure if they have pursued this any further, but if not &#8211; now&#8217;s the time. And maybe the LCS could follow suit?<\/p>\n<p>Unless we really want this subterranean army of &#8216;good&#8217; pedophiles to keep using the author of <em>Alice<\/em> as their patron saint.<\/p>\n<p>Ok, it&#8217;s a beautiful day, birds singing, sky blue, and we just hope this is the last time\u00a0 we have to write about this for a while.<\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\ude41<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rejecting Apology II has generated a huge amount of response in the last day, some of which we can even publish without risking nausea in our readers.\u00a0 Check out the &#8216;recent comments&#8217; section in the sidebar. A repeated argument is\u00a0that if a man wants to have sex with kids but doesn&#8217;t act on it then [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[11,1,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-carroll-myth","category-uncategorized","category-wilful-myth-blindness"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p17WIo-37","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/contrariwise.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}